Showing posts with label Insurance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Insurance. Show all posts

Sunday, December 08, 2013

Talking about personal insurance

Nearing year end, I have been approached by a number of insurance agents recommending me their companies' products. That got me to look at my existing portfolio (something which I haven't done in quite a while!)

After some research, I found that insurance can generally cover the following areas (disclaimer: to the more sophisticated, please pardon the simplification) -
  • Death - this can take a few forms, such as term life or whole life participating policies.
    A term life policy pays out the sum insured upon death.
    With a whole life participating policy, the sum insured is paid out together with a 'bonus value' (accumulated over the years) upon death. Alternatively, one can surrender the policy at any point whereupon he or she will receive the 'cash value' of the policy. For this, one should note the 'breakeven point' of the policy, which is the point where the cash value (which builds up over time) catches up with the cumulative premiums paid. Nowadays for paying of premiums, there is the option of 'limited pay', which means that instead of spreading out the premiums over the entire duration of the policy, one can choose to front-load the premiums over the first e.g. 10 / 20 years, albeit at higher amounts of course.
  •  
  • Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) - in most cases, this is usually tagged along with death benefit, meaning that the sum insured will be applicable for death and TPD.
  • Terminal Illness (TI) - this is paid out when the person insured is declared by a doctor to have a condition which is likely to lead to death within 12 months. As with TPD, TI sometimes accompanies death benefit.
  • Critical Illness (CI) - based on my understanding, the list of insurable critical illnesses has been standardised to the current 30 by the relevant authorities and now applies to all insurance companies.
    CI can be standalone policies (more pricey?) or as a rider to life policies.
    Since the case of Theresa Tan, there are now also early critical illness plans which cover the early / intermediate stages of the list of 30 CI, the most prominent being that of cancer. As a comparison, early CI pays out (up to $75k) even when diagnose with benign tumours while CI only pays out if it is malignant or invasive in nature. Note however that early CI can be more expensive than CI since there is a higher chance of payout.
  • Accident - personal accident plans are relatively cheap (in the order of a few dollars a month) and pays for TCM and for e.g. loss of limb, etc.
  • Hospitalisation and Surgical - in Singapore, this is covered by MediShield (which can be paid for from Medisave Account). Personally, I feel that this is probably one of the more essential types of insurance for protecting oneself and one's families, and had discussed this previously.
  • Disability Income - this kicks in when one is declared unable to work as a result of injury or illness (I was quoted hand injury in the case of a surgeon and depression in the case of an office worker as examples), and will pay a monthly amount in place of the salary which one would have been earning. These are highly customisable - for instance, one can choose the amount to be paid (up to 75% of last-drawn salary), paid up to what age (e.g. 60, 65, 70), and the waiting period before the payouts start (e.g. 60, 90, 180 days).
  • Savings - an example is an endowment policy which pays out upon maturity. In most cases, this is used to help meet a specific financial objective, such as saving up for children's education.

  • Investment - an investment-linked policy (ILP) allows one to practise 'dollar cost averaging' and build up a position in a desired asset class / geographical market by putting in a regular fixed amount each month. I had shared a little personal experience of this previously.
Of course, the above descriptions only scratch the surface of the full complement of insurance policies available. Nonetheless, I figured it was important to understand my options and from there assess what is my own comfort level - how much am I prepared to pay for insurance (just to share, I was told 10-20% of my income as a rough gauge) and how much would I like to be covered for? As with buying anything, there will be the cut-price option and the cut-throat option... Feel free to share your own experience :)

Sunday, January 01, 2012

Aviva SAF Insurance II

For a while now, I have been considering increasing my critical illness coverage to complement my private MediShield plan (including a rider to cover the deductible and co-insurance portions) which I had signed with GE.

Of my existing plans, there were two immediate options open to me: tagging onto my Aviva SAF Group Insurance or onto my ILP. However, as my ILP was meant almost exclusively for investment purposes (as opposed to insurance), my preference was for the former.

Cost-wise, up till age 45, the charge for critical illness coverage under the Aviva SAF Group Insurance was $5.00 monthly per $50,000 coverage (max $300,000 coverage). Thereafter, the monthly premium progressively increases from year to year until the cut-off age of 65.


For reference, some details for two of the more prominent critical illness plans are as follows:

GE Early-Payout CriticalCare Plus - advertised as providing payout at the earlier stages of critical illness, $63 a month based on a non-smoking male, aged 30 at next birthday with a sum assured amount of $100,000 for a policy term of 30 years

PRUmultiple crisis cover - advertised as providing up to three critical illness claims, inclusive of 2 cancer claims, $1.76 a day for a female non-smoker aged 35 on her next birthday covered for $50,000 over 50 years


Just for comparison purposes, the monthly premiums for a 30-ish male/female non-smoker to be covered for $50,000 are estimated to be (* please consult a qualified agent for accurate quotes and kindly do not take these values at face value):

Aviva SAF Insurance: $5.00
GE Early-Payout CriticalCare Plus: ~$31.50
PRUmultiple crisis cover: ~$52.80

For cost-conscious consumers, the Aviva plan is clearly the most basic and hence least expensive. If one should desire the additional benefits which the other two plans bring, then there is of course an additional price to pay. To each his own...

Thursday, July 28, 2011

ILP Update July 2011

Having reached three years for my ILP, it was useful for me to take stock of where it currently stands. The reason for this is simple: in Year 1, a hefty penalty is imposed where only 15% of premiums paid is allocated to investment, this increases to 60% in years 2-3 and to 102% from years 4-6, thereafter from year 7 onwards, 105% is allocated to investment.


Looking at the graph plotted for premiums paid (blue) and amount allocated to investment (red), one can see the change in gradient of the red line to reflect the higher percentage in years 2-3 compared to year 1. What is disappointing to me is that the green data points for cash values are not consistently above the red line. This means that after deducting all expenses, the fund is not yet making money for me. For now I am continuing to monitor. After all, with the Europe and US debt situations not being healthy, this has had a toll on equity markets which have been pretty range-bound.

Ultimately, I would hope for the green points to go above the red line first and then the blue line over the long run. Only time will tell if these ILPs are worth it for private investors like myself.

Saturday, May 08, 2010

Aviva SAF Insurance I

Recently, Aviva sent me a letter offering me an "exclusive offer to automatically upgrade your (my) group term life insurance cover to $200,000". The key points of the letter were:
  1. Revision of maximum coverage to $600,000 in October 2009
  2. Automatic upgrade of insurance coverage to $200,000 costing $0.85 daily (monthly premium $25.60) unless the insured person opts out
Upon reading the letter, I had an issue with (2) straightaway. It reminded me of the "innocent unless proven guilty" versus "guilty unless proven innocent" conundrum. In this case, Aviva was adopting the "Yes you want it unless you say otherwise" approach. I do not think this should be the way. For me, where insurance is concerned, there are two conflicting stands:
  1. The level of coverage I would like to have
  2. The level of coverage I can afford
Who doesn't want to be covered for a million bucks? But would you be able to pay the premium every month?

Subsequently though, Aviva realised its customer relations folly and sent me another letter. This time, it was "Yes you want it if you say so, otherwise status quo", which is of course much more palatable to the customer. In fact, Aviva was fairly quick to act upon its initial boo-boo. The first letter was dated 30 March and the second one 12 April.

I first signed up for this policy back when I was a blur-like-sotong NSF. It was only when I graduated and entered working life that I started to review all my existing insurance policies and recalled that I have been paying for this all this while. Initially, my monthly premium was $16 for a coverage of $100,000. Then, in a letter dated 28 April 2008, Aviva offered existing customers an automatic upgrade (similar to the one now):


This brings me to my current policy. Upon receiving the recent letter from Aviva, I did a brief comparison:


The third column is the premium per month per '000 coverage and shall serve as the basis of my comparison. To my surprise, the insurance component of my Manulife ILP turned out to be the cheapest in this respect, followed by the CPF DPS, and finally by the Aviva SAF insurance.

However, I will be the first to concede that this is not an entirely fair comparison study.

Firstly, insurers have to make money from somewhere, and for an ILP, the insurer's profits do not come from the insurance component but from the investment portion in the form of fees and the penalties incurred during the first few years.

Secondly, to compare amongst these various insurance policies that I have, is a bit like comparing apples to oranges. For instance, the Aviva SAF insurance has amongst other benefits, accident coverage and hospital cash whereas the CPF DPS is solely for death and total and permanent disability (TPD), which the Aviva SAF insurance also covers. A fairer comparison would entail comparing between policies which have the exact same terms and benefits, such as between term policies. The trouble is, I find that policies nowadays tend to combine benefits across various categories such that it is harder to classify them solely as just one certain type of insurance.

Nevertheless, despite the seemingly unfavourable results of the comparison, I have decided to go for the upgrade due to a few reasons:
  1. To increase my overall coverage
  2. Aviva SAF insurance allows spouse and children to enjoy the same coverage under one policy
  3. Every year, I receive a partial cash rebate which helps to lessen the actual cost of the insurance
  4. This offer includes free first one month premium
For more details on Aviva SAF Insurance and CPF DPS:
http://www.aviva-singapore.com.sg/life-and-health/for-individuals/saf-insurance-for-nsmen.html
http://ask-us.cpf.gov.sg/explorefaq.asp?category=23023


Disclaimer: The writer is covered under GE DPS, Aviva SAF Insurance and Manulink Flexi ILP mentioned in the post. This is not a solicitation to purchase insurance. Premiums quoted are for males who are non-smokers, aged 35 and under.

Private MediShield Plans


CPF


In Singapore, we have 3 accounts under CPF:
  1. Ordinary Account (OA)
  2. Special Account (SA)
  3. Medisave Account (MA)
From CPF website:
For (1) Private Sector Employees

(2) Government Non-Pensionable Employees

(3) Non-Pensionable Employees in Statutory Bodies & Aided Schools

(4) Singapore Permanent Resident (SPR) employees from their 3rd year onwards

Employee Age
(years)
Contribution By Employer
(% of wage)
Contribution By Employee
(% of wage)
Total Contribution
(% of wage)
Credited Into
Ordinary Account
(Ratio of Con)
Special Account
(Ratio of Con)
Medisave Account
(Ratio of Con)
35 & below 14.5* 20 34.5* 0.6667* 0.1449* 0.1884*
Above
35 - 45
14.5* 20 34.5* 0.6088* 0.1739* 0.2173*
Above
45 - 50
14.5* 20 34.5* 0.5509* 0.2028* 0.2463*
Above
50 - 55
10.5* 18 28.5* 0.4562* 0.2456* 0.2982*
Above
55 - 60
7.5* 12.5 20* 0.575* 0 0.425*
Above
60 - 65
5* 7.5 12.5* 0.28* 0 0.72*
Above 65 5* 5 10* 0.1* 0 0.9*

In addition, at the May Day Rally 2010, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that the Government will raise the employers’ CPF contribution rate by 1 percentage point. The increase will be done gradually in two steps to moderate the impact on employers. The first 0.5 percentage point increase will be implemented on 1 September 2010, and be made into the Medisave Account (MA). The remaining 0.5 percentage point increase will be effected 6 months later on 1 March 2011, and will be made to the Special Account (SA).

For illustration purposes, this means that for the 35 and below age group in the above table, the contribution by employer will be 15% wef from 1 Sep 2010 (extra 0.5% going towards MA) and 15.5% wef from 1 Mar 2011 (extra 0.5% going towards SA). Hence, the percentages under the green heading will change accordingly to reflect this.

For more details:
http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/Gen-Info/Con-Rates/ContriRa.htm
http://mycpf.cpf.gov.sg/Members/Gen-Info/CPFChanges/Changes_ConRates.htm


MediShield


MediShield is the basic medical insurance scheme introduced in 1990 by the Singapore government for CPF members. It is designed to help meet medical expenses from major illnesses, which could not be sufficiently covered by the balance in Medisave, and will cover up to 80% of medical bills at the Class B2/C level. MediShield operates on a co-payment and deductible system to avoid problems associated with first-dollar, comprehensive insurance. Premiums for MediShield can be paid by Medisave.

From MOH website:
Age Next BirthdayMediShield Yearly Premiums

1 to 3033
31 to 4054
41 to 50114
51 to 60225
61 to 65332
66 to 70372
71 to 73390
74 to 75462
76 to 78524
79 to 80615
81 to 831087
84 to 851123

MediShield covers medical expenses incurred during hospitalisation, including:
  • Normal ward charges
  • Intensive care unit charges
  • Medications
  • Investigations
  • Surgical implants
  • Surgical procedure fees
MediShield also caters for certain approved outpatient treatments such as:
  • Kidney dialysis
  • Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer treatment
  • Cyclosporin and Tacrolimus drugs for organ transplant patients
  • Erythropoietin drug for dialysis patients
For more details:
http://ask-us.cpf.gov.sg/explorefaq.asp?category=23069
http://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/hcfinancing.aspx?id=306


Medisave-approved Integrated Shield Plans

Apart from MediShield, Singaporeans can also choose from several other Medisave-approved Integrated Shield Plans offered by private insurers:
  1. NTUC Income
  2. AIA
  3. Great Eastern Life
  4. Aviva
  5. Prudential Assurance
Since 1 July 2005, each of these Medisave-approved plans have been integrated with MediShield to form a single integrated plan. These Integrated Shield Plans provide you with additional benefits and coverage when you opt for Class A and B1 wards in the restructured hospitals, or private hospitalisation.

Policyholders on the Medisave-approved Integrated Shield plans retain the benefits of MediShield membership, while their private insurer will service all their needs. In other words, policyholders pay their premium, and submit claims directly to their private insurer. Their private insurer will then sort out all arrangements with MediShield.

Medisave can also be used to pay for premiums of these private Medisave-approved Integrated Shield plans, subject to a withdrawal limit of $800 per policy, per year. For policyholders aged 81 and above, the withdrawal limit is $1,150 per policy, per year.

Since MediShield premiums are paid on a yearly basis, the transition between MediShield and this is effected by crediting back on a pro-rated basis the unused remainder of the MediShield yearly premium which has already been paid, and then deducting the premium of the Integrated Shield plan, whereupon the new coverage starts.

From MOH website:
The following claims return rate table shows how long it takes each insurer to process claims with positive payouts.

The phrase, cumulative claims return rate, refers to the percentage of claims processed by the insurer within one week, two weeks and one month. Note that the fifth column shows the median number of days it takes each insurer to process claims.


Cumulative Claims Return RateMedian claims return rate (days)
<= 1 week<= 2 weeks<= 4 weeks
AIA
69%
76%
83%
4
AVIVA
77%
79%
85%
2
Great Eastern
90%
92%
94%
1
NTUC Income
93%
94%
96%
1
Prudential
81%
87%
93%
1

(1 January 2010 – 31 March 2010)


I did a bit of research into the various Integrated Shield plans. Premium-wise, NTUC appears to be the cheapest, this could be due to its mass market customer base and reputation as the "people's insurer" (according to my cousin who is with GE). Coverage-wise, they all appear to be similar, other than for specific diseases and/or certain benefits.

One other thing to take note of about these plans is that they normally have a few levels
of coverage, from Class B1 to Class A and finally to private hospitals. Also, there is usually some sort of rider available which takes care of the deductible and co-insurance portions of the bill, but this of course comes with its own separate premium. So depending on one's needs and finances, one may opt for the plan (with or without rider) which gives greatest ease of mind. After all, this is what insurance is for.

For more details:
http://www.moh.gov.sg/mohcorp/hcfinancing.aspx?id=342


Disclaimer: The writer is covered under GE since Jan/Feb 2010. This is not a solicitation to purchase insurance.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Personal Financial Journey

This blog was started as a joke by one of my crazy friends and for what it was worth, faithfully maintained throughout my undergrad days. For that, thanks kks! (btw, how do I reinstate the chatterbox?) However, henceforth this space shall serve a serious purpose for me. From now on, it will track my personal financial journey, for better or for worse, and will be a reminder of my investment efforts, whether in the stock market or otherwise.

Firstly, to bring my portfolio up to date:

  • 30 July 2008
    I graduated in 2008 and my first job began on 1 Aug 08. One of the first financial instruments I set up was an ILP with Manulife, with regular monthly premiums going into a China equity fund and a Singapore equity fund.
  • 16, 17 Oct 2008
    Opened AUD and NZD fixed deposits respectively with OCBC under two names: my brother and I. Bought AUD at 1.0602 and NZD at 0.9208 with auto-renewal every 3 months.
  • 7 Jan 2009
    Did a top up of my ILP China and Singapore funds
  • 11 May 2009
    Did a top up of my ILP and bought into GEMs and India equity funds
  • 6 - 24 July 2009
    Opened a trading account with DBSV, using ibanking cash upfront account for cheaper brokerage fees of $18 per transaction. My first trade was Golden Agri, bought at $0.33 and sold at $0.375
  • 28 Aug 2009
    Collected dividends from Cambridge and FCT
  • 2 - 9 Oct 2009
    Bought Straits Asia at $2.03 and sold at $2.07 after the loading facility collapsed due to heavy rain (must thank Bernie for alerting me to this news, otherwise I would have been mong cha cha about the sudden share price plunge the following day)
  • 15 July - 14 Oct 2009
    Bought Cambridge at $0.375 and sold at $0.45
  • 26 Nov, 14 Dec 2009
    Collected dividends from FCT, Suntec and PLife
  • 2, 15 Dec 2009
    Did a fund transfer of all my existing ILP funds into a single Asia equity fund and then a partial surrender to lock in my profits from the two top ups earlier in the year. Also, switched the allocation for all my monthly premiums to the same Asia fund
  • 24 Dec 2009
    Received advanced distribution from Mapletree due to private share placement
  • 20 Jan 2010
    Received advanced distribution from Suntec due to private share placement
  • 10 Nov 2009 - 10 Feb 2010
    Bought Mapletree at $0.705 and sold at $0.785
  • 26 Feb 2010
    Collected dividends from FCT, Suntec, PLife, Mapletree and Starhill
Will review my current portfolio after every quarter, first one due on this blog after 31 Mar.